I like the way the new Enclave looks, especially since it looks far better than the vehicle it ostensibly replaces, the Rendezvous. The other day, I saw an Enclave in the 'wild' for the first time, and something didn't look right. I tried to figure it out while I sat there looking at it in traffic, and it didn't click. And then I came home and started looking at pictures, and I figured it out-
Concept Enclave
2008 Enclave
Can you spot the difference?
First of all, GM needs to be commended for bringing this thing out so close to actual concept form.
But here's the nitpick.
Look at the C-pillar. The pillar right behind the rear door. On the concept, it flows right into the glass, and it has some brightwork design on it. On the actual model, they swept the pillar back some more, added in the triangle window portion right ahead of it, and the pillar now lacks the brightwork. It's not as noticeable on the dark grey example above, but in the colour that I saw it in (white), the pillar really stood out, and not in a good way- it looked almost tacked on.
Why did GM make such a small change that to me make a big difference in the way the back end of the vehicle looks? I have no idea. I just know that it looks different, and not necessarily better.
And so ends another session of nitpicking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
My take on the pillar a couple months ago was that it was originally intended to be blacked out, but that it didn't look right when blacked out. It's unusual to have a body-color pillar entirely separated from the rest of the body by the DLO chrome trim.
I suspect that the changes you note were made to commonize the Buick with the other Lambdas, and to get the rear window to retract more fully.
Post a Comment